Pascal's wager fallacy
Web20 Aug 2024 · Simply stated, Pascal’s wager argues that you’re better off believing in God, because if you’re right, you stand to gain eternal joy. And if you’re wrong, it won’t make any difference whatsoever. Yet, on the other hand, if you don’t believe in God and turn out to be wrong, you’ll receive eternal suffering. WebYou are right -- the fallacy in Pascal's wager was the assumption of, say, 50/50 chance of the Christian God actually existing. Which wouldn't look too incredible in Pascal's times. With …
Pascal's wager fallacy
Did you know?
WebYou're construing the wager (if I understand you correctly) as an argument for God's existence. I don't think the wager is an argument for God's existence. It is, rather, an argument to the effect that IF he exists, and you prefer manna and quails to eternal flames, THEN you ought to start . . .well, handling rattlesnakes or something. WebHowever, what we have here is the term “Pascal’s Wager” being applied solely because the payoff being considered is large – the reasoning being perceptually recognized as an …
WebBlaise Pascal's famous wager was that even if the existence of God cannot be determined through reason, a rational person should wager as though God exists, because living life … Web17 Jun 2024 · One being the Pascal Wager’s argument. This theory states that either God exists or God does not exist, you can either wager for God or wager against God. This …
Web1 Jan 2000 · The argument (call it “PW”) may be formulated as follows: ( a) If God exists, then whoever doesn’t believe in him will end up being eternally tormented or at least … WebPascal's Wager says that the consequences are too great to NOT believe in a god than to believe that you might as well believe n a god. Pastor Locke thinks he can get around the …
Web17 Mar 2009 · Pascal Wager != Pascal Wager Fallacy. If original Pascal wager didn't depend on a highly improbable proposition (existence of a particular version of god), it would be …
WebInfinities in ethics pose some difficult problems. For example, if the universe is infinite, there are already infinite numbers of good and bad things. Adding or removing finitely many of them leaves infinitely many of both. This means aggregative consequentialist theories (those that maximize the sum of the values of individual structures) will be indifferent … ishockxWeb4 Oct 2024 · Pascal’s Wager assumes that people can choose what they believe when this simply isn’t true. Either something makes sense to you – to varying degrees, or it doesn’t. … safe for work meme of the dayWebAlthough Pascal’s Wager serves as a stepping-stone for non-believers, it is a rather vague, faithless and inaccurate argument. Pascal’s wager takes the position of a gambler. It says that it is far more logical to believe in God because the odds are in one’s favor. Pascal lays it down on a diagram like so: if one believes in God and lives ... ishod wair blazerWebPascal’s wager fits our reality well. It’s this false dichotomy of good and evil which is flawed and Pascal’s wager is a result. Good is the only truth. Evil is a false reactionary force. … ishod shoesWebthe hands of the “Many-Gods-Objection.” This paper describes the beauty of Pascal’s Wager in its proper context and expresses the erroneous postmodern appropriation of the Wager. Keywords: Pascal, Wager, Postmodernism, Pensées, Richard Kearney 1. Introduction Pascal’s apology will always be associated with his famous Wager. safe for webhttp://lesswrong.com/lw/z0/the_pascals_wager_fallacy_fallacy/ safe for work gamesWebThe most obvious problem with the wager is that it proposes a false dichotomy fallacy. The individual making the bet is given only two options, “God” or “No God.” But there are other … ishod hazell